Sexual abstinence (also known as
continence,
is the practice of refraining from some or all aspects of sexual
activity for medical, psychological, legal, social, financial,
philosophical, moral or religious reasons. Asexuality is distinct
from sexual abstinence and
celibacy,
which are behavioral and generally motivated by factors such as an
individual's personal or religious beliefs.
HISTORY
The ancient world discouraged promiscuity for both
health and social reasons. According to Pythagoras (6th century BCE)
sex should be practiced in the winter, but not the summer, but was
harmful to male health in every season because the loss of semen was
dangerous, hard to control and both physically and spiritually
exhausting, but had no effect on females.
This idea may have
been merged with Zoroastrian ideas of good and evil in a philosophy
known as gnosticism, which influenced Christian and Islamic attitudes
to sexual activity.
WESTERN ATTITUDES
Historically, there has been a swing from the
sexually liberal end of the Industrial Revolution to the chaste
values of the early Victorian period. This was then followed by a new
puritanism from the late Victorian era to the mid-1900s. This
important transformation often colors discussion of sexual behavior
in the later 20th century. World War I began a return to sexual
freedom and indulgence, but more often than not, the appearance of
conforming to the earlier moral values of abstinence before marriage
was retained. With the conclusion of World War II, the societal
importance of abstinence declined swiftly. The advent of the first
oral contraceptive pill and widely available antibiotics suppressed
many consequences of wide and free sexual behavior, while social
morals were also changing. By the 1970s, abandonment of premarital
chastity was no longer taboo in the majority of western societies,
and the reverse became true. To have experienced a number of sexual
partners before marriage became the new norm. Some cultural groups
continued to place a value on the moral purity of an abstainer, but
abstinence was caught up in a wider reevaluation of moral values.
During the early 20th century, prominent feminist
and birth control advocate Margaret Sanger argued that abstinence
from sexual activity led to greater endurance and strength, and was a
sign of the best of the species:
"Though sex cells are placed in a part of the
anatomy for the essential purpose of easily expelling them into the
female for the purpose of reproduction, there are other elements in
the sexual fluid which are the essence of blood, nerve, brain, and
muscle. When redirected in to the building and strengthening of
these, we find men or women of the greatest endurance greatest
magnetic power. A girl can waste her creative powers by brooding over
a love affair to the extent of exhausting her system, with the
results not unlike the effects of masturbation and debauchery."
[Sanger 1920, p. 46]
In some cultures, those who infringe the rules
regarding chastity may be ostracized. Social re-acceptance can
sometimes be regained by marriage between the two. In the West, in
the mid-20th century, there was a stigma attached to being a
'one-parent family,' and an illegitimate child could be legitimized
by the marriage of the parents. (This latter is still the case in
many Western countries, though the lifting of legal penalties and
social stigma regarding illegitimacy has rendered this irrelevant to
social acceptance.)
LONG-TERM
ABSTINENCE
Lifelong (or at least
long-term) abstinence, often associated with philosophical or
religious asceticism, is distinguished from chastity before marriage.
Abstinence is often viewed as an act of self-control over the natural
desire to have sex. The display of the strength of character allows
the abstainer to set an example for those not able to contain their
"base urges." At other times, abstinence has been seen as a
great social skill practiced by those who refuse to engage with the
material and physical world. Some groups that propose sexual
abstinence consider it an essential means to reach a particular
intellectual or spiritual condition, or that chastity allows one to
achieve a required self-control or self-consciousness.
ABSTINENCE AS A
LIFESTYLE
Although many individuals
abstain from sex for reasons such as religion or morality, for some
individuals, sexual abstinence is a lifestyle choice. Those
individuals who fall into this category may have a dislike of sex
(antisexualism), or are simply not interested in it (asexuality).
They may view sex as an unnecessary part of human life. As with other
lifestyle choices, this attitude toward sex and relationships can
vary greatly. Some who choose such a lifestyle still accept sex for
reproduction, some engage in romantic relationships, and some engage
in masturbation.
HISTORICAL VIEWS ON
ABSTINENCE
Throughout history, and especially prior to the 20th
century, there have been those who have held that sexual abstinence
confers numerous health benefits. For males, lack of abstinence was
thought to cause a reduction of vitality. In modern times, the
argument has been phrased in biological terms, claiming that loss of
semen through ejaculation results in a depletion of vital nutrients
such as lecithin and phosphorus, which are also found at high levels
in the brain. Conservation of the semen allegedly allows it to be
reabsorbed back into the bloodstream and aid in the healthy
development of the body. Along these lines, the noted German
philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche spoke of the positive physiological
effects of abstinence: "The reabsorption of semen by the blood
... perhaps prompts the stimulus of power, the unrest of all forces
towards the overcoming of resistances ... The feeling of power has so
far mounted highest in abstinent priests and hermits" (quoted by
Walter Kaufman in his classic, Nietzsche: Philosopher,
Psychologist, Antichrist, p. 222). Before the "sexual
revolution" of the 1960s, it was commonly believed by members of
the medical profession that numerous mental and physical diseases in
men were caused primarily by loss of nutrients through seminal
discharge, and that the deliberate conservation of this substance
would lead to increased health, vitality, and intellectual prowess.
This also applied to masturbation, which were also thought to lead to
bedwetting and hairy palms.
Some advantages in favor of sexual abstinence were
also claimed by Walter Siegmeister, better known as Dr. Raymond W.
Bernard A.B., M.A., PhD, an early 20th century American alternative
health, esoteric writer, author and mystic, who formed part of the
alternative reality subculture. In his essay entitled Science
discovers the physiological value of continence (1957) he states:
- "[I]t is
clear that there is an important internal physiological relation
between the secretions of the sex glands and the central nervous
system, that the loss of these secretions, voluntarily or
involuntarily, exercises a detrimental effect on the nutrition and
vitality of the nerves and brain, while, on the other hand, the
conservation of these secretions has a vitalizing effect on the
nervous system, a regenerating effect on the endocrine glands, and a
rejuvenating effect on the organism as a whole."
POSSIBLE PHYSICAL EFFECTS
Sexual abstinence diminishes the risk of contracting
sexually transmitted diseases but prevents one from obtaining the
health benefits of sex.
Queen's University Belfast tracked the mortality of
about 1,000 middle-aged men over the course of a decade. The study,
published in 1997 in the British Medical Journal found that "men
who reported the highest frequency of orgasm enjoyed a death rate
half that of the laggards". The report also cited other studies
to show that having sex even a few times a week may be associated
with the following: improved sense of smell; reduced risk of heart
disease; weight loss and overall fitness; reduced depression; the
relief or lessening of pain; less frequent colds and flu; better
bladder control; and better teeth. The report cited a study published
by the British Journal of Urology International which indicated that
men in their 20s can reduce by a third their chance of getting
prostate cancer by ejaculating more than five times a week.
POSSIBLE
PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS
There have been
numerous studies indicating that excessive repression of the sexual
instinct leads to an increase in the overall level of aggression in a
given society. Societies forbidding premarital sex are plagued by
acts of rage and tend to have higher rates of crime and violence.
There may be a link between sexual repression and aggression,
insensitivity, criminal behaviour, and a greater likelihood of
killing and torturing enemies.
PREMARITAL CHASTITY
In most cultural,
ethical, and religious contexts, coitus within marriage is not
considered to be opposed to chastity. Some religious systems prohibit
sexual activities between a person and anyone other than a spouse of
that person, as have, in the past, legal systems and societal norms.
In such contexts, sexual abstinence was prescribed for
unmarried individuals for the purpose of chastity. Chastity
has been used as a synonym for sexual abstinence, but they are
similar but different behavior and restrictions.
ABSTINENCE-ONLY SEX
EDUCATION
Abstinence-only sex education is a form of sex
education that teaches abstinence from sex, and often excludes many
other types of sexual and reproductive health education, particularly
regarding birth control and safe sex. Education programs which focus
exclusively on abstinence have hardly been shown to delay sexual
activity. Such programs promote sexual abstinence until marriage and
oftentimes condemn the use of contraceptives. Comprehensive sex
education, by contrast, covers the use of contraceptives as well as
abstinence.
Organizations such as SIECUS have called
abstinence-only programs "fear-based," and "designed
to control young people’s sexual behavior by instilling fear,
shame, and guilt." Author Judith Levine has argued that there
might be a natural tendency of abstinence educators to escalate their
messages: "Like advertising, which must continually jack up its
seduction just to stay visible as other advertising proliferates,
abstinence education had to make sex scarier and scarier and, at the
same time, chastity sweeter." (Harmful to Minors, p. 108)
In spite of these criticisms, federal government
support has made abstinence the de facto focus of sex education in
the United States, so that opponents frequently adopt the line that
abstinence education is acceptable only if it is combined with other
methods, such as instruction in the use of condoms, and easy
availability thereof. Most nations of Western Europe use more
comprehensive measures, and in sharp contrast to the heated
discussion in the U.S., abstinence is hardly discussed as an
educational measure.
A U.S. federal government-promoted abstinence-only
program was aimed at teens in 1981 in order to discourage premarital
sex and unwanted pregnancies. However, recent studies conducted by
Mathematica Policy Research, showed ineffectiveness of this program.
The Responsible Education About Life Act was introduced by Senator
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and Representatives Barbara Lee (D-CA) and
Christopher Shays (R-CT) to support age-appropriate sexual education.
This program is focused to provide teenagers with science-based
information on sexual health, so that they can make a sound decision
regarding their sex-life.
In 2006, the George W. Bush administration expanded
abstinence programs from teens to adults, by introducing programs to
encourage unmarried adults to remain abstinent until marriage.
Family-planning advocates and researchers denounced the program as
unrealistic, due to the rising age of first-time marriage in the
United States.
In 2010, University of Pennsylvania researchers
released a model study showing that abstinence programs can be
effective. The study randomly assigned some middle-school students to
an eight-hour abstinence curriculum and others to sex-ed programs
that included contraceptives and mixed messages. Penn researchers
found that the abstinence-only offering reduced subsequent sexual
activity by one-third more than other programs.
POPULARITY AND
EFFECTIVENESS
The advent of AIDS helped
build a more favorable view of abstinence. However, a review of 13
U.S. sex-abstinence programs involving over 15,000 people by Oxford
University found that they do not stop risky sexual behavior, or help
in the prevention of unwanted pregnancy. Recently, the United States
Congress also found similar results in a study conducted by
Mathematica Policy Research on abstinence. Currently, there are also
issues as to what abstinence means: is it an abstinence from sexual
intercourse, or from sexual behavior? Movements such as
True
Love Waits in America, which ask teenagers to refrain from sex
before marriage, are heavily subscribed, but surveys of sexual
behavior indicate an increase in the popularity of oral sex.
CHASTITY IN
RELIGION
Some religions regard Chastity as a virtue expected
of faithful adherents. This usually includes abstinence from sex for
the unmarried, and fidelity to a marriage partner.
In some religions, some groups of people are
expected to remain unmarried and to abstain from sex completely.
These groups include monks, nuns and priests in various sects of
Hinduism, Buddhism and Christianity. Chastity is required of the
respective sacerdotal orders. The Shakers, on the other hand, impose
chastity in the form of celibacy for all members, even forgoing
procreation such as the case with the castration cult.
CHRISTIANITY
Many Christians teach that sexual intercourse is
meant to take place within the context of marriage, and that sexual
abstinence is the norm outside of that. But for married couples, Paul
of Tarsus wrote that they should not deprive each other, except for a
short time for devotion to prayer.
Catholicism defines chastity as the virtue that
moderates the sexual appetite. Unmarried Catholics express chastity
through sexual abstinence. Sexual intercourse within marriage is
considered chaste when it retains the twofold significance of union
and procreation. See also the Evangelical counsels.
The Orthodox Church teaches chastity until marriage.
But even then, in accordance with the teaching of the Apostle Paul,
periods of abstinence are encouraged among married couples.
Traditionally, Orthodox spouses abstain from physical relations on
Wednesdays, Fridays, Saturdays the eves of Great
Feasts and throughout the four lenten periods (Great Lent,
Nativity fast, Apostles fast and Dormition fast).
JUDAISM
Judaism forbids intercourse outside marriage (which
is termed zenuth or promiscuity), but has no ideal of
chastity. Within marriage abstinence is also required during and
following a woman's menstruation. The husband is not allowed to
deprive sex from his wife, even if she is not fertile (known as
mitzvat 'onah').
ISLAM
Islam forbids intercourse
outside of marriage; however, maintaining celibacy as an act of piety
is not mentioned, while marriage for all who are able is strongly
encouraged. Abstinence is practiced during the time of a woman's
menstruation. Abstinence from sexual intercourse is also practiced
from dawn to dusk during days where fasting is observed. Also in the
time of Hajj people are not allowed to have sexual relationships,
because their body has to stay pure while performing pilgrimage.
HINDUISM
The Hindu tradition of Brahmacharya places great
emphasis on abstinence as a way of harnessing the energy of body and
mind towards the goal of spiritual realization. In males, the semen
(Veerya) is considered sacred, and its preservation (except when used
for procreation) and conversion into higher life-energy (Ojas) is
considered essential for the development of enhanced intellectual and
spiritual capacities.
The blending of sexual and spiritual is portrayed in
Hindu iconography, as seen in ubiquitous phallic and vaginal
iconography in Hindu temples and for instance in the Kharjuraho and
Konarak medieval temples, where thousands of couples having sex in
endless positions, and with the gods, are carved in deep bas-relief.
However, these depictions of sex are not generally understood to be a
license for free sexual practices, but are instead meant to celebrate
procreation as an integral part of existence in the universe. In
actual practice, there is a strong societal taboo against pre-marital
sex for both males and females, which still exists today in Hindu
cultures.(needs citation)
CHASTITY BELT
A chastity belt is a locking item of clothing
designed to prevent sexual intercourse. They may be used to protect
the wearer from rape or temptation. Some devices have been designed
with additional features to prevent masturbation. Chastity belts have
been created for males and females, ostensibly for the purpose of
chastity.